Unlearning and relearning sexuality: a qualitative exploration of The Sex Wrap, a sex education podcast.

BACKGROUND: Traditional school-based sexuality education has a myriad of problems with its successful delivery, including access to comprehensive sexuality curricula, access to trained facilitators, and community and parental fears. As an alternative form of sexuality education, The Sex Wrap podcast is released in weekly episodes of about 20-45min, providing listeners with diverse, evidence-based sexual health information. METHODS: Participants in a larger mixed-methods study evaluating The Sex Wrap were invited to participate in qualitative in-depth interviews to explore their experiences with sexuality education, including The Sex Wrap , and how they relate to information received through the podcast. Seventeen interviews were conducted with listeners of The Sex Wrap , aged 20-25years old. RESULTS: One core category and three axial codes were identified in the interview data. The core category is: sexuality education is an ongoing process that includes learning and unlearning. The three temporally related axial codes are: (1) experiences with formal and informal sexuality education (mostly negative) drove participants to seek more information about sex, (2) participants use The Sex Wrap as a way of exploring and personalising information about sexuality, and (3) participants equipped with comprehensive sexuality education are empowered to educate their peers. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that podcast-based interventions, such as The Sex Wrap , can play a key role in young people's process of sexuality education and should be considered for incorporation into other forms of sex education.

Factors Associated With Severe Bacterial Infections in People Who Inject Drugs: A Single-center Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: People who inject drugs are at increased risk for several bacterial infections such as bacteremia, endocarditis, and osteomyelitis resulting in severe morbidity and high care costs. Limited data exist surrounding the injection drug use practices and behaviors that may increase the risk of these infections. METHODS: Individuals admitted to a single hospital in New York City with severe bacterial infection, between August 2020 and June 2021, were recruited to partake in an in-depth survey examining potential factors, both demographic and injection drug use behavioral, associated with severe bacterial infections. RESULTS: Thirty-four participants were recruited with injection drug use-associated severe bacterial infection. The mean age was 36.5 years; 21 (62%) were currently homeless, with 19 (56%) patients admitted for infective endocarditis. The mean length of hospital stay of all participants was 32.2 days; 94% received medication for opioid use disorder while admitted, whereas 35% left before treatment completion with a patient-directed discharge or elopement. Eight-two percent of participants were injected daily in the prior 30 days, with an average of 276 injections per participant. Fifty percent of participants reported requiring multiple sticks per injection event "always" or "very often," with 94% reporting reuse of syringes in the prior month. CONCLUSIONS: Severe bacterial infections in people who inject drugs resulted in prolonged and complex hospitalization that culminate in suboptimal outcomes despite aggressive measures to engage patients in medication for opioid use disorder. Numerous nonsterile injection drug use practices were identified, indicating a gap in current infection prevention harm reduction messaging.

Hepatitis C virus risk among young people who inject drugs.

Background: Injection drug use (IDU) is the leading risk factor for hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission in the U.S. While the general risk factors for HCV transmission are known, there is limited work on how these factors interact and impact young people who inject drugs (YPWID). Methods: Project data were drawn from a study of 539 New York City (NYC) residents ages 18-29 who were recruited via Respondent-Driven Sampling and, reported past-month non-medical use of prescription opioids and/or heroin. Analyses are based on a subsample of 337 (62%) who reported injecting any drug in the past 12 months. All variables were assessed via self-report, except HCV status, which was established via rapid antibody testing. Integrating the observed statistical associations with extant literature on HCV risk, we also developed a qualitative system dynamics (SD) model to use as a supplemental data visualization tool to explore plausible pathways and interactions among key risk and protective factors for HCV. Results: Results showed a 31% HCV antibody prevalence with an overall incidence of 10 per 100 person-years. HCV status was independently correlated with having shared cookers with two or more people (AOR = 2.17); injected drugs 4-6 years (AOR = 2.49) and 7 or more years (AOR = 4.95); lifetime homelessness (AOR = 2.52); and having been incarcerated two or more times (AOR = 1.99). These outcomes along with the extant literature on HCV risk were used to develop the qualitative SD model, which describes a causal hypothesis around non-linearities and feedback loop structures underlying the spread of HCV among YPWID. Conclusions: Despite ongoing harm reduction efforts, close to a third of YPWID in the community sample have been exposed to HCV, have risks for injection drug use, and face challenges with structural factors that may be preventing adequate intervention. The qualitative SD model explores these issues and contributes to a better understanding of how these various risk factors interact and what policies could potentially be effective in reducing HCV infections.

Severe bacterial infections in people who inject drugs: the role of injection-related tissue damage.

BACKGROUND: In the context of the current U.S. injection drug use epidemic, targeted public health harm reduction strategies have traditionally focused on overdose prevention and reducing transmission of blood-borne viral infections. Severe bacterial infections (SBI) associated with intravenous drug use have been increasing in frequency in the U.S. over the last decade. This qualitative study aims to identify the risk factors associated with SBI in hospitalized individuals with recent injection drug use. METHODS: Qualitative analysis (n = 15) was performed using an in-depth, semi-structured interview of participants admitted to Bellevue Hospital, NYC, with SBI and recent history of injection drug use. Participants were identified through a referral from either the Infectious Diseases or Addition Medicine consultative services. Interviews were transcribed, descriptively coded, and analyzed for key themes. RESULTS: Participants reported a basic understanding of prevention of blood-borne viral transmission but limited understanding of SBI risk. Participants described engagement in high risk injection behaviors prior to hospitalization with SBI. These practices included polysubstance use, repetitive tissue damage, nonsterile drug diluting water and multipurpose use of water container, lack of hand and skin hygiene, re-use of injection equipment, network sharing, and structural factors leading to an unstable drug injection environment. Qualitative analysis led to the proposal of an Ecosocial understanding of SBI risk, detailing the multi-level interplay between individuals and their social and physical environments in producing risk for negative health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Structural factors and injection drug use networks directly impact drug use, injection drug use practices, and harm reduction knowledge, ultimately resulting in tissue damage and inoculation of bacteria into the host and subsequent development of SBI. Effective healthcare and community prevention efforts targeted toward reducing risk of bacterial infections could prevent long-term hospitalizations, decrease health care expenditures, and reduce morbidity and mortality.

Medical provider stigma experienced by people who use drugs (MPS-PWUD): Development and validation of a scale among people who currently inject drugs in New York City.

BACKGROUND: Stigmatizing attitudes towards people who use drugs (PWUD) impact their access and retention in health care. Current measures of PWUD stigma in medical settings are limited. Therefore, we developed and validated theMedical Provider Stigma Experienced by PWUD (MPS-PWUD) scale. METHODS: As part of an ongoing clinical trial, we recruited HCV RNA positive people who inject drugs in New York City. Based on 164 participants, principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted on fifteen stigma items answered on a 5-point Likert scale. We evaluated internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and assessed construct validity by comparing stigma levels with willingness to communicate health concerns with medical providers and likelihood to seek HCV treatment. RESULTS: PCA identified a 9-item scale with two components of stigmatization that explained 60.8 % of the total variance and overall high internal consistency (alpha = 0.90). Theenacted stigma (alpha = 0.90) consisted of 6 scale items related to the medical providers' stigmatizing actions or perceptions. The internalized stigma component (alpha = 0.84) included 3 scale items related to PWUD's shame or drug use disclosure. As hypothesized, higher levels of either stigma were associated with less likelihood to openly communicate with medical providers (p < 0.005). Participants with a higher level of enacted stigma were less likely to seek HCV treatment (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The validated MPS-PWUD scale could help healthcare providers, harm reduction services and researchers measure stigma experienced by PWUD in medical settings in efforts to minimize the impact of stigma on limiting access to and retention of care for PWUD.